On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:31:36AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > When acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get gets called with an index of say 2, it should > > not care if acpi_get_gpiod for index 0 or 1 returns -EPROBE_DEFER. > > > > This allows drivers which request a gpioint with index > 0 to function > > if there is no gpiochip driver (loaded) for gpioints with a lower index. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I am dependent on Mika and Rafael to review ACPI/GPIO patches, > maybe I should just put in a special entry to MAINTAINERS for > this file... anyway let's see what they say. Hans, could you in future Cc patches related to ACPI to linux-acpi mailing list as well? This one I looked up from linux-gpio mail archives. The patch looks good to me so, Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html