Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] clk: sunxi-ng: support R40 SoC

[Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi Icenowy,

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 01:54:58PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>>
>> 2017年2月22日 07:03于 Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>写道：
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 01:37:17AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> > > Allwinner R40 SoC have a clock controller module in the style of the
>> > > SoCs beyond sun6i, however, it's more rich and complex.
>> > >
>> > > Add support for it.
>> > >
>> > > As the user manual is still not available, this driver is made with
>> > > knowledge from clk-sun8iw11.c in the BSP kernel source.
>> >
>> > Missing SoB.
>> >
>> > Why are some patches tagged as RFC and some don't?
>>
>> There's still no open User Manual for R40, so I tagged CCU-related
>> drivers RFC.
>>
>> Pinctrl driver can be written with the datasheet draft, which is
>> available now.
>>
>> For USB we have never user manual so everything is educated guess --
>> so it's not RFC.
>
> It's still kind of weird to mix and match patches with and without RFC
> tags.

Allwinner just released the docs today. See

    https://github.com/tinalinux/docs/tree/r40-v1.y

Could you check your patches against it, and maybe we don't need the
RFC tags anymore?

ChenYu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html