On 05/01/17 22:42, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> So while this patch technically looks correct, I was wondering if we >>> should really explore the possibility of making the whole of sunxi >>> pinctrl DT controlled. >>> I brought this up a while ago, but people weren't overly enthusiastic >>> about it, though their argument weren't really convincing to me[1]. >>> >>> So: >>> As this "driver" here is basically a table linking GPIO bit settings >>> (the actual mux value) to names and every pin we care about needs to be >>> enumerated in the DT anyway, why not just add something like: >>> allwinner,pinmux = <4>; >>> to each pin(group) in the DT and get rid of this "driver" file here >>> entirely? >> >> I'm open to that if you can use pinctrl-single which is in the kernel >> for this purpose only, and is used with both OMAPs and HiSilicon. > > I'm not open to that, and I'm getting tired of discussing it over and > over again. Andre, if you want to be convinced again, please read the > last discussion we had on this topic. As I said: It didn't convince me back then. And frankly we didn't really discuss it back then, I just refrained from entering a discussion against _two_ maintainers at this time, since my capacity on this kind of email threads is really very limited - especially for something that is a hobby to me. It isn't the highest priority on my list, but I am still planning on sketching something, so that we can discuss about actual code. As it seems like your new patches bring some relief to the immediate copy&paste pain (though the actual DT aspect still remains), I will shut up - for now ;-) Cheers, Andre. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html