On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 01:55:44PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 3:33 PM, André Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So while this patch technically looks correct, I was wondering if we > > should really explore the possibility of making the whole of sunxi > > pinctrl DT controlled. > > I brought this up a while ago, but people weren't overly enthusiastic > > about it, though their argument weren't really convincing to me[1]. > > > > So: > > As this "driver" here is basically a table linking GPIO bit settings > > (the actual mux value) to names and every pin we care about needs to be > > enumerated in the DT anyway, why not just add something like: > > allwinner,pinmux = <4>; > > to each pin(group) in the DT and get rid of this "driver" file here > > entirely? > > I'm open to that if you can use pinctrl-single which is in the kernel > for this purpose only, and is used with both OMAPs and HiSilicon. I'm not open to that, and I'm getting tired of discussing it over and over again. Andre, if you want to be convinced again, please read the last discussion we had on this topic. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
