On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 09:45:32AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:24 PM Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Making pinctrl drivers and subsequently the pinctrl framework > > user-controllable, allows building a kernel without this. > > While in many (most) cases, this could make the system unbootable, it > > does allow building smaller kernels for those situations where picntrl > > is not needed. > > > > One such situation is when building a kernel for NXP LS1021A systems, > > which does not have run-time controllable pinctrl, so pinctrl framework > > and drivers are 100% dead-weight. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I guess this needs to be merged through the SoC tree. Hi Linus, Reading your comment[1], I was thinking that you will merge the series through pinctrl tree, no? Shawn [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CACRpkdYbOTXmap-vJy4JNZSaZnE=yzC35EPD2F=bD8gWdD8-GQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/