On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:24 PM Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Making pinctrl drivers and subsequently the pinctrl framework > user-controllable, allows building a kernel without this. > While in many (most) cases, this could make the system unbootable, it > does allow building smaller kernels for those situations where picntrl > is not needed. > > One such situation is when building a kernel for NXP LS1021A systems, > which does not have run-time controllable pinctrl, so pinctrl framework > and drivers are 100% dead-weight. > > > Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> I guess this needs to be merged through the SoC tree. Yours, Linus Walleij