Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:24 PM Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Making pinctrl drivers and subsequently the pinctrl framework >> user-controllable, allows building a kernel without this. >> While in many (most) cases, this could make the system unbootable, it >> does allow building smaller kernels for those situations where picntrl >> is not needed. >> >> One such situation is when building a kernel for NXP LS1021A systems, >> which does not have run-time controllable pinctrl, so pinctrl framework >> and drivers are 100% dead-weight. >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I guess this needs to be merged through the SoC tree. Anything more I need to make that happen? /Esben