On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:18:23PM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 02.06.2015 22:41, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:09:15AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> >> @@ -1783,18 +1783,13 @@ static int wm8903_gpio_direction_in(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> >> {
> >> struct wm8903_priv *wm8903 = gpio_to_wm8903(chip);
> >> unsigned int mask, val;
> >> - int ret;
> >>
> >> mask = WM8903_GPn_FN_MASK | WM8903_GPn_DIR_MASK;
> >> val = (WM8903_GPn_FN_GPIO_INPUT << WM8903_GPn_FN_SHIFT) |
> >> WM8903_GPn_DIR;
> >>
> >> - ret = regmap_update_bits(wm8903->regmap,
> >> - WM8903_GPIO_CONTROL_1 + offset, mask, val);
> >> - if (ret < 0)
> >> - return ret;
> >> -
> >> - return 0;
> >> + return regmap_update_bits(wm8903->regmap,
> >> + WM8903_GPIO_CONTROL_1 + offset, mask, val);
> >> }
> >>
> >> static int wm8903_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> > This appears to be an unrelated coding style change.
> this particular patch is named "simplify gpiolib callbacks".
> Do you prefer to separate the change here in .direction_in
> implementation from the rest?
It doesn't appear to make any changes related to boolean variables
(AFAICT it's just removing the ret variable) so it shouldn't be in a
change about boolean variables.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
