Hello Mark, On 02.06.2015 22:41, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:09:15AM +0300, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: > >> @@ -1783,18 +1783,13 @@ static int wm8903_gpio_direction_in(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) >> { >> struct wm8903_priv *wm8903 = gpio_to_wm8903(chip); >> unsigned int mask, val; >> - int ret; >> >> mask = WM8903_GPn_FN_MASK | WM8903_GPn_DIR_MASK; >> val = (WM8903_GPn_FN_GPIO_INPUT << WM8903_GPn_FN_SHIFT) | >> WM8903_GPn_DIR; >> >> - ret = regmap_update_bits(wm8903->regmap, >> - WM8903_GPIO_CONTROL_1 + offset, mask, val); >> - if (ret < 0) >> - return ret; >> - >> - return 0; >> + return regmap_update_bits(wm8903->regmap, >> + WM8903_GPIO_CONTROL_1 + offset, mask, val); >> } >> >> static int wm8903_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset) > > This appears to be an unrelated coding style change. > this particular patch is named "simplify gpiolib callbacks". Do you prefer to separate the change here in .direction_in implementation from the rest? -- With best wishes, Vladimir -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html