Hi, As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is rather costly. Kind regards, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:07:36 +0100
- User-agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.19.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index()
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- Next by Date: Re: Possible regression in next-20150310 due to pinctrl: sh-pfc: r8a7790: Remove non existing GPIO pins
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Remove emev2 platform_device_id entry
- Next by thread: [PATCH 1/2] gpio / ACPI: Avoid unnecessary checks in __gpiod_get_index()
- Index(es):
 |