On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is > rather costly. Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series? If not, would there be any problem if I took these to my tree? I'll probably have material on top of them. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 02:37:06 +0100
- In-reply-to: <4032246.STUT1iRmIk@vostro.rjw.lan>
- User-agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.19.0+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Alexandre Courbot
- Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- References:
- [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- From: Rafael J. Wysocki
- [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Store register/field widths in u8 instead of unsigned long
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] pinctrl: sh-pfc: Store register/field widths in u8 instead of unsigned long
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio / ACPI: Use local variable instead of ACPI_HANDLE()
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()
- Index(es):
 |