I'll get the patches today... I have about five small patches that aren't pushed out to github or kernel.org yet, some cosmetic patches and a couple of things you suggested in mail messages... if they get in a fight with your new patches I'll just ditch them and re-do whichever ones of them are still needed after I've got your new stuff tested. Thanks! -Mike On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:22:40PM -0500, Mike Marshall wrote: >> > If there is (or at least supposed to be) something that prevents completions >> > of readdir requests (on unrelated directories, by different processes, etc.) >> > out of order, PLEASE SAY SO. I would really prefer not to have to fight >> > the readdir side of that mess; cancels are already bad enough ;-/ >> >> Hi Al... your ideas sound good to me, I'll try to get you good >> answers on stuff like the above sometime tomorrow... > > OK, this is really, really completely untested, might chew your data, > bugger your dog, etc. OTOH, if it somehow fails to do the above, it > ought to deal with cancels properly. > > Pushed into #orangefs-untested, along with two wait_for_direct_io() fixes > discussed upthread. This is _not_ all - it still needs saner "wait for slot" > logics, switching op->waitq to completion/killing loop in > wait_for_matching_downcall(), etc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
