On 08/27/2014 03:46 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:55:56PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
<>
>> Having my sign-off on it and pushing to Jens means I need to
>> review and approve the patch, and so I had to fix the checkpatch
>> complain before pushing. And I did put at the patch commit message
>> that I have edited for check-patch. And I have sent the mail directly
>> addressed to you for approval.
>
> That's not what SubmittingPatches says that you are to do. Indeed,
> option (c) says that you haven't modified my patch.
>
Sorry that we are fighting here, let us please do what you decide to
do.
But you are wrong about SubmittingPatches rules. If you read the all
section then you see that I also have (b) which holds in my case
(b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best
of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source
license and I have the right under that license to submit that
work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part
by me, under the same open source license (unless I am
permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated
in the file; or
(c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other
person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified
it.
Note the text that says (a) ... or (b) ... or (c)
>> If I have offended you in any way please forgive me, none was intended,
>> opposite I have only the deepest gratitude and admiration, and I want
>> for these patches to be pushed forward.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Boaz
What do you want that we do, I need to send these 4 patches to Jens ASAP?
Tell me and I'll do it
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
