Re: [PATCH 5/9 v2] SQUASHME: prd: Last fixes for partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/25/2014 11:10 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote:
<>
> I think we can still have a working probe by instead comparing the passed in
> dev_t against the dev_t we get back from disk_to_dev(prd->prd_disk), but I'd
> really like a use case so I can test this.  Until then I think I'm just going
> to stub out prd/pmem_probe() with a BUG() so we can see if anyone hits it.
> 
> It seems like this is preferable to just registering NULL for probe, as that
> would cause an oops in kobj_lookup(() when probe() is blindly called without
> checking for NULL.
> 

I have a version I think you will love it removes the probe and bunch of
other stuff.

I tested it heavily it just works

Comming soon, I'm preparing trees right now
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux