On 08/27/2014 07:38 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 08:36:19PM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >> It is getting late around here and I will not be pushing new trees >> tonight, first thing tomorrow morning. (Your last push caused me lots >> of extra work, you must not do like you did when working on a rebasing >> out-off-tree project involving more then one person, but more on the proper >> procedure tomorrow with the push of the trees) > > If you're going to push a new tree, please do so on top of the DAX > v10 patches I just sent out. Matthew hi No, I'm pushing 4 brd patches for mainline for inclusion today, into current 3.17-rcX cycle. The set includes your one patch which is needed out and before the DAX patches. > If you have any changes you want to make > to the bdev_direct_access() patch, then please make them separately, > instead of editing my patch like you did last time. > I apologize about that but I did use the proper protocol here. I'm sending your patch as part of my push from my tree, through Jens into linus. I have put my sign-off-by on the patch, then Jens will put his, before it will finally be pushed to Linus. Having my sign-off on it and pushing to Jens means I need to review and approve the patch, and so I had to fix the checkpatch complain before pushing. And I did put at the patch commit message that I have edited for check-patch. And I have sent the mail directly addressed to you for approval. If I have offended you in any way please forgive me, none was intended, opposite I have only the deepest gratitude and admiration, and I want for these patches to be pushed forward. Thanks Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
