Re: [PATCH 00/16] vfs: atomic open v4 (part 1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > For instance, in lookup_open(), you call security_path_mknod() prior to
> > calling vfs_create(), but you don't call it prior to calling atomic_open()
> > or in, say, nfs_atomic_open().
> 
> We call security_path_mknod() before ->atomic_open() in may_o_create().

Okay.

> > I'm also wondering if you're missing an audit_inode() call in the if
> > (created) path after the retry_lookup label.
> 
> There's no audit_inode() on the created dentry neither in the original
> code nor in the modified code.
> 
> But that may be a bug regardless, it's just independent of my changes.
> At least AFAICS.

Fair enough.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux