Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] linux servers as a storage server - what'smissing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/19/2012 12:32 PM, Loke, Chetan wrote:
True, a single front-end won't see all of those LUNs/devices. So not
a
big concern
about the front-end hosts.

I am thinking of a use-case where folks can use a linux-box to
manage
their different storage arrays.
So this linux box with 'libstoragemgmt + app' needs to
manage(scan/create/delete/so on) all those LUNs.

People do have boxes with thousands of luns though&  file systems in
active use.
Both for SAN and NAS volumes.

One of the challenges is what to do when just one LUN (or NFS server)
crashes
and burns.
The FS needs to go read-only(plain&  simple) because you don't know
what's going on.
You can't risk writing data anymore. Let the apps fail. You can make it
happen even today.
It's a simple exercise.

Nope - it needs to be torn down and we need to be able to cleanly unmount it.

Letting an application see and read-only file system when the disk is gone or server down is not very useful since you won't get any non-cached data back.

Also, if you have an ability to migrate that mount (same mount point) to another server or clone LUN, you want to unmount the source so you can remount the data under that same mount point/namespace....

ric


Like others, I have seen/debugged enough weirdness when it comes to
resets/aborts(FYI - 200+ hosts in a cluster).
Because of NDA reasons I can't disclose a whole lot but folks have
fixed/enhanced
scsi stack to make resets/aborts fully robust. And you need folks who
can debug
'apps/FS/block/initiator/wire-protocol/target-side' in one shot. Simple.
So when you say 'crash&  burn' then either or 'all' of the above(minus
the protocol handling) might need fixing.

You simply cannot "reboot" the server to clean up after one
bad mount when you have thousands of other happy users runs on
thousands/hundreds
of other mount points :)
Again, can't front-end can go read only and limit the outage w/o
disturbing thousands of users?


Chetan Loke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux