Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][ATTEND] Merging the Lustre filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 04:46:51PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> The point is that both the kernel and Lustre have changed enough that kernel patches are no longer needed on the client, and we are working toward removing the kernel patches on the server.  At that point it would be possible to merge Lustre as an isolated (though very large) filesystem.

Exactly.  And that's the reason why it has no business hogging away LSF
sessions.  It might be fine as a BOF session if you think you have
enough people actually doing the work around that otherwise wouldn't be,
but it really isn't anything of general interest for all filesystem
developers.

	"talk is cheap, show me the code"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux