Re: Q. NFS, return value of close(2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Trond Myklebust:
> Yes. That looks correct. Can you resend with an appropriate signed-off
> line, etc.?

Sure.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
commit e56f956a08a6227004cd9b7747df6a089dbb3594
Author: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Aug 12 02:00:02 2010 +0900

    NFS: fix the return value of nfs_file_fsync()
    
    By the commit
    	af7fa16 2010-08-03 NFS: Fix up the fsync code
    close(2) became returning the non-zero value even if it went well.
    nfs_file_fsync() should return 0 when "status" is positive.
    
    Signed-off-by: J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
index 2d141a7..eb51bd6 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ nfs_file_fsync(struct file *file, int datasync)
 	have_error |= test_bit(NFS_CONTEXT_ERROR_WRITE, &ctx->flags);
 	if (have_error)
 		ret = xchg(&ctx->error, 0);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (!ret && status < 0)
 		ret = status;
 	return ret;
 }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux