Re: [PATCH 2/2] add f_flags to struct statfs(64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/29/2010 01:57 AM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> ST_VALID is required to differentiate between no flags, and
> flags field unsupported of course.

Not needed if a new syscall would be used.


> At least from 2.4.0 does memset it. 2.2.26 does not. Can you
> live with that?

We still support building glibc for everything from linux 2.0 on, at
least for x86.  I really have no idea whether such old kernels are still
in use and if yes, whether userland gets updated.  I wouldn't have a
problem with bumping the minimum required kernel version.

- -- 
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkwpw/kACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHT02gCcCOGJj/fr/WCHJpuJ8CYVMKRu
KhwAoKXX7L5sDXTk8g6CZdIHL0y7S+i4
=tlZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux