Re: [PATCH 2/2] add f_flags to struct statfs(64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 02:59:21AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 06/29/2010 01:57 AM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > ST_VALID is required to differentiate between no flags, and
> > flags field unsupported of course.
> 
> Not needed if a new syscall would be used.

True.  But if we add a new syscall anyway I'd rather implement the
glibc statvfs64 structure directly.  The gives filesystem which
really want to a chance to implement f_favail, and we could also
store the full uuid in the f_spare fields now that we have more space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux