Re: [PATCH 2/2] pid: Optional first-fit pid allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:18:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This seems thin.  Is there more we can tell our users?  What are the
> visible effects of this?  What are the benefits?  Why would they want
> to turn it on?

Thanks for review and comments (also Alexander).

> I mean, there are veritable paragraphs in the changelogs, but just a
> single line in the user-facing docs.  Seems there could be more...

I decided not to fiddle with allocation strategies and disable pid_max
in namespaces by default.

Michal

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux