On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 09:02:08AM +0000, David Laight <david.laight.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It also seems a good way of being able to predict the next pid and > doing all the 'nasty' things that allows because there is no guard > time on pid reuse. The motivations was not to make guessing next pid more difficult, I'll update the docs with better explanation. > Both first-fit and next-fit have the same issue. > Picking a random pid is better. I surely don't want to delve into this now. (I acknowledge that having a possible range specified per pid ns would be useful for such a randomization.) Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
