Re: [PATCH 2/2] pid: Optional first-fit pid allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:02:49 +0100 Michal Koutný <mkoutny@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/sysctl/kernel.rst
> @@ -1043,6 +1043,8 @@ The last pid allocated in the current (the one task using this sysctl
>  lives in) pid namespace. When selecting a pid for a next task on fork
>  kernel tries to allocate a number starting from this one.
>  
> +When set to -1, first-fit pid numbering is used instead of the next-fit.
> +

This seems thin.  Is there more we can tell our users?  What are the
visible effects of this?  What are the benefits?  Why would they want
to turn it on?

I mean, there are veritable paragraphs in the changelogs, but just a
single line in the user-facing docs.  Seems there could be more...





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux