Re: [RFC][PATCH v4] readahead: introduce O_RANDOM for POSIX_FADV_RANDOM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 10:03:22AM +0800, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:56:20 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > For now I'll use bit 040000000, which happen to equal to
> > FMODE_NONOTIFY and will be masked out by __dentry_open()
> > in the very beginning.
> 
> But also clashes with __O_SYNC on sparc, sorry.  I am not sure how we are
> meant to reasonably choose these values any more ...

Where is it? I cannot grep find one in arch/.
There is one defined in include/asm-generic/fcntl.h:

#ifndef O_SYNC
#define __O_SYNC        04000000
#define O_SYNC          (__O_SYNC|O_DSYNC)
#endif

However it has one less '0' :)

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux