Re: [RFC][PATCH v4] readahead: introduce O_RANDOM for POSIX_FADV_RANDOM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 20:56:20 +0800 Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For now I'll use bit 040000000, which happen to equal to
> FMODE_NONOTIFY and will be masked out by __dentry_open()
> in the very beginning.

But also clashes with __O_SYNC on sparc, sorry.  I am not sure how we are
meant to reasonably choose these values any more ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpqpntqXz5fJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux