On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 04:17:19PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > @@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ > > #define O_NDELAY O_NONBLOCK > > #endif > > > > +#ifndef O_RANDOM > > +#define O_RANDOM 010000000 /* random access pattern hint */ > > +#endif > > This value conflicts with O_CLOEXEC on alpha and parisc and O_NOATIME on > sparc. Also when I tried to use this value for O_RSYNC and tested it I could not actually see it getting propagated by the open code. Eitherway I don't think an O_ value is a good idea for a simple access pattern hint. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
