Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > Can we please revert commit e4c570c4cb7a95dbfafa3d016d2739bf3fdfe319 > "task_struct: make journal_info conditional" I'm fine to revert it, because it seems merged accidentally. > > I think I gave a good enough arguments to not merge it. > To iterate: > * patch makes impossible to start using ext3 on EXT3_FS=n kernels > without reboot. > * this is done only for one pointer on task_struct I don't think it's only one pointer. There might be a lot of "only one pointer". > > None of config options which define task_struct are tristate directly > or effectively. So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option to remove unused area, right? Of cause, that option should be handled carefully. If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep this kind of patches out of tree? thanks, Hiroshi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
