On 12/18/09, Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So we never allow to make memory usage small with providing an option > to remove unused area, right? We certainly allow this if it results in zero loss in functionality. > If I want to reduce memory usage by this way, should I keep > this kind of patches out of tree? Certainly nobody can prohibit you from keeping patch out of tree. But if you want something mainlinable, moving ->journal_info to fs-specific data structures should do the trick. Or something. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
