On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 09:06:35AM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On 08/28/2009 08:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> - given that our current O_SYNC really is and always has been actuall >> Posix O_DSYNC > > If this is true, then this proposal would work, yes. I'll put it on my todo list. While reading through the Posix specs I came up with some questions that you might be able to answer: - O_RSYNC basically means we need to commit atime updates before a read returns, right? It would be easy to implement it in a slightly suboptimal fashion, but is there any point? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
