Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:06:35 -0700
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090828154647.GA15808@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090814 Fedora/3.0-2.6.b3.fc11 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b3

On 08/28/2009 08:46 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

  - given that our current O_SYNC really is and always has been actuall
    Posix O_DSYNC


If this is true, then this proposal would work, yes.

--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

References:
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Jens Axboe
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
Next by Date: Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
Previous by thread: Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
Next by thread: Re: adding proper O_SYNC/O_DSYNC, was Re: O_DIRECT and barriers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]