Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:53:36 +0100
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20231127135945.GB24437@lst.de>

On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:59:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This looks ok, but I still find these locking helper so horrible to
> follow..

What do you still find objectionable?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

References:
- [PATCH 0/2] super: small tweaks
  - From: Christian Brauner
- [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()
  - From: Christian Brauner
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()
  - From: Christoph Hellwig

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] super: massage wait event mechanism
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] super: massage wait event mechanism
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Ext4 Filesystem] [Union Filesystem] [Filesystem Testing] [Ceph Users] [Ecryptfs] [NTFS 3] [AutoFS] [Kernel Newbies] [Share Photos] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux Cachefs] [Reiser Filesystem] [Linux RAID] [NTFS 3] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [CEPH Development]

Powered by Linux