Re: [PATCH 2/2] super: don't bother with WARN_ON_ONCE()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 12:51:31PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index f3227b22879d..844ca13e9d93 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -2067,10 +2067,7 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb, enum freeze_holder who)
>  	/* Release s_umount to preserve sb_start_write -> s_umount ordering */
>  	super_unlock_excl(sb);
>  	sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> -	if (!super_lock_excl(sb)) {
> -		WARN_ON_ONCE("Dying superblock while freezing!");
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	}
> +	__super_lock_excl(sb);

This looks ok, but I still find these locking helper so horrible to
follow..





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux