(Please ignore my previous mail which was CC'ed to the wrong list) Hello! On Thu, 2023-07-20 at 18:30 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 05:27:57PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 17:45, Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 08:37:16PM -0800, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > > > Also, as far as I can see, available volume in report (mount_0.gz) somehow corrupted already: > > > > > > > > Syzbot generates deliberately-corrupted (aka fuzzed) filesystem images. > > > > So basically, you can't trust anything you read from the disc. > > > > > > > > > > If the volume has been deliberately corrupted, then no guarantee that file system > > > driver will behave nicely. Technically speaking, inode write operation should never > > > happened for corrupted volume because the corruption should be detected during > > > b-tree node initialization time. If we would like to achieve such nice state of HFS/HFS+ > > > drivers, then it requires a lot of refactoring/implementation efforts. I am not sure that > > > it is worth to do because not so many guys really use HFS/HFS+ as the main file > > > system under Linux. > > > > > > Most popular distros will happily auto-mount HFS/HFS+ from anything > > inserted into USB (e.g. what one may think is a charger). This creates > > interesting security consequences for most Linux users. > > An image may also be corrupted non-deliberately, which will lead to > > random memory corruptions if the kernel trusts it blindly. > > Then we should delete the HFS/HFS+ filesystems. They're orphaned in > MAINTAINERS and if distros are going to do such a damnfool thing, > then we must stop them. Both HFS and HFS+ work perfectly fine. And if distributions or users are so sensitive about security, it's up to them to blacklist individual features in the kernel. Both HFS and HFS+ have been the default filesystem on MacOS for 30 years and I don't think it's justified to introduce such a hard compatibility breakage just because some people are worried about theoretical evil maid attacks. HFS/HFS+ mandatory if you want to boot Linux on a classic Mac or PowerMac and I don't think it's okay to break all these systems running Linux. Thanks, Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer `. `' Physicist `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
