On Wed, Jan 4, 2023, at 20:06, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> I suspect this code is basically all dead. From what I can tell, hfs
> only gets updates for
>
> (a) syzbot reports
>
> (b) vfs interface changes
There is clearly no new work going into it, and most data exchange
with MacOS would use HFS+, but I think there are still some users.
> and the last real changes seem to have been by Ernesto A. Fernández
> back in 2018.
>
> Hmm. Looking at that code, we have another bug in there, introduced by
> an earlier fix for a similar issue: commit 8d824e69d9f3 ("hfs: fix OOB
> Read in __hfs_brec_find") added
>
> + if (HFS_I(main_inode)->cat_key.CName.len > HFS_NAMELEN)
> + return -EIO;
>
> but it's after hfs_find_init(), so it should actually have done a
> hfs_find_exit() to not leak memory.
>
> So we should probably fix that too.
>
> Something like this ENTIRELY UNTESTED patch?
>
> Do we have anybody who looks at hfs?
Adding Viacheslav Dubeyko to Cc, he's at least been reviewing
patches for HFS and HFS+ somewhat recently. The linux-m68k
list may have some users dual-booting old MacOS.
Viacheslav, see the start of the thread at
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000dbce4e05f170f289@xxxxxxxxxx/
Arnd
