Jens Axboe wrote:
Ah, I see. Rather non-typical convention though. I expected
bdi_register() to clean-up stuff in case of failure. Isn't
it a better interface?
You already did a bdi_init() at that point. bdi_destroy() must be used
to clean up after both bdi_init() and/or bdi_register().
Right, silly me.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
