Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 17:05:47 +0200
> Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > I ran testing with artificial
> > bdi_work allocation failures to verify the oom path
> 
> I bet you didn't use lib/fault-inject.c :(

I didn't, it was a 2-second hack to add a

        static int i;

        if (!(i++ % 4))
                return NULL;

so I didn't look further...

> For tricky pieces of core kernel like this, there's a good case for
> including and permanently maintaining fault injection testing
> capabilities.

I agree.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux