Re: [PATCH 0/12] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 27 2009, Damien Wyart wrote:
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> [2009-05-26 23:11]:
> > > OK, I spotted the problem. If we fallback to the on-stack allocation in
> > > bdi_writeback_all(), then we do the wait for the work completion with
> > > the bdi_lock mutex held. This can deadlock with bdi_forker_task(), so if
> > > we require that to be invoked to make progress (happens if a thread
> > > needs to be restarted), then we have a deadlock on that mutex.
> 
> > > I'll cook up a fix for this, but probably not before the morning.
> 
> > Untested fix. I think it should work, but I haven't run it here yet.
> 
> Thanks for your feedback and explanations. Will not be able to test the
> patch before the afternoon. Will then give feedback as soon as I can. Of
> course, I can also test a new fix or series if you send one in the
> morning, after your own testing.

Just wait for the new series, I'll be posting it this morning. And
thanks for your testing and report!

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux