Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] FS, MM, and stable trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 12:36:23AM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> It deserves mention that network file systems like Steve's and mine
> have a slightly heavier lift because two systems at a time are needed
> to test with -- client and server.

Should be super easy with kdevops.

> I've found that requires more
> infrastructure around Jenkins or whatever framework you like to drive
> testing. Having a discussion about that and comparing notes about how
> this particular issue can be resolved would be of interest to me.

It sounds like this conversation has been a lot more about testing
than stable. So maybe testing should be its own topic at LSFMM.

  Luis



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux