On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 04:56:20AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Oct 07, 2008 06:12 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:07:06PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > +* FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_UNMOUNTED_IO > > > > I think the point we're trying to get down to is that this is not just a > > normal block that you can access using a block number but some > > complicated encoding scheme. Maybe > > > > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_ENCODED > > I like this name much better than the cumbersome double-negative > "NO_UNMOUNTED_IO" that is _still_ not any more clear than the > previous proposals. Sounds like we're converging on a color for the bike shed.... any objections to this name before I spin out a new version of the patches? It's just a global search and replace, but we've done it *so* many times. :-) - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
