On Oct 07, 2008 06:12 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 05:07:06PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > > +* FIEMAP_EXTENT_NO_UNMOUNTED_IO > > I think the point we're trying to get down to is that this is not just a > normal block that you can access using a block number but some > complicated encoding scheme. Maybe > > * FIEMAP_EXTENT_ENCODED I like this name much better than the cumbersome double-negative "NO_UNMOUNTED_IO" that is _still_ not any more clear than the previous proposals. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
