Miklos, You omitted to answer my question, the last sentence below: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Miklos, > > I already fixed most of the isues with utimensat() in my previous > version of the patch several days back, and that patch (probably > still) applies against current mainline. [...] > This is a bug. It is one of *several* bugs in the original > implementation of the utimensat()/futimens() interface. All of them > should be fixed. I have by now provided fixes for most of them. (Not > point 2 above, but with a little help that should be quickly fixed as > well.) At this point, I think you need to explain why you think those > fixes shouldn't be applied. Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
