Re: [PATCH] utimensat() non-conformances and fixes [v3]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:22:30PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> For 2) you can just use permission() instead of vfs_permission() which
> is exactly the same in this case (and consolidated into a common
> function later in the vfs-cleanups tree).

Miklos, don't delude people into thinking the vfs-cleanups tree is ever
going to get merged in its current state.  Al's NAKed the path_* stuff,
Christoph's NAKed it too.  Ignoring them and putting up a VFS tree of
your own is not going to help matters.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux