Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > I have been bitten a few times by timeout based caches in the past
> > (NFS and SMB (pre-oplock)).  Simple things like editing a file, then
> > running "ssh compiler-box make" from the editor quietly building
> > incorrect code - and even subsequent make commands don't fix it.  Or
> > when I edit a file, then tell someone I've changed the file - and then
> > they edit the file, and my edits are lost.  Very annoying.  Nobody
> > should build those kind of caches into new software.  :-)
> 
> Oh well, you can turn off caching if it bothers you :)  OTOH it would
> be rather hard (and probably against the point) to try to extend the
> sftp protocol to handle cache coherency.  Sshfs is not meant to be a
> normal filesystem (although some people are trying to use it for home
> directories and such), just a simple way to access remote files.

Oh, I agree.  Violent agreement, they call it :-)

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux