Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> If you have the free hot caches then it performs the same as in-kernel 
> file systems, user space isn't involved at all.

Presumably if "user space isn't involved at all", it must require that
user space has granted caching rights to the kernel over a FUSE
cache coherency protocol?

Otherwise I don't see how the kernel could coherently cache file pages
for some kinds of FUSE filesystems.  (E.g. sshfs, for example: every
operation must surely invoke a user space request or involve granting
a caching right to the kernel, to keep accesses coherent with other
users of the same remote files).

Ergo, either its not coherent, or there is some coherency protocol,
which does require _some_ work in the user space implementation.

-- Jamie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux