On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 08:55:44PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > it's a dead filesystem that a very few people still have a reason to > > use. If FUSE is where this should live, then I'll just simply focus my > > time on that instead (since I already have it in FUSE). > > Yes, pursuing the FUSE implementation sounds a better approach - it avoids > burdening the kernel with a filesysstem which few will be interested in and > is more practical for use by those who _are_ interested in it. No way. For a normal foreign block filesystem a proper kernel implementation is much better. And this one is particularly well-written. Lately I really start wondering why we keep adding crap all over the core, but if we have a modular new filesystem that's quite nice people start complaining. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
