On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:07 AM, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2) then I added your patch on top of that, which did change something > but not really for the better: now even the restarted lock request > doesn't succeed after the interrupt. > > According to my suspicion, this is an issue in the server, while both > referenced patches touch only the client. Note that my little patch purely resolves the situation we were seeing on the client side. We were using Netapps for servers. We're actually using that small patch, against 2.6.22, in production right now and it has still solved our issue. -Aaron -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
