Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:11:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> A new filesystem such as the one he's working on would, one hopes, be used
> by an increasing number of people.  Whereas I expect that the already-tiny
> number of people who use OMFS will *fall* over time.

It is not about pohmelfs, but any other. When did you look at fs/kconfig
last time? There are lots of filesystems which were obsoleted way before
I first time started using computer. Hope you saw with pdp-11 in action
(I only on pictures), since sysv filesystem is very unlikely to get new
users today. Or befs - beos is very widely distributed os. Others?
 
> Guys, a few years ago Linus's rule of thumb for merging an FS was,
> approximately, "it is already being shipped by distros".  The bar is _much_
> lower than that now.  Largely because I personally think that it should be.

And Linus was wrong. This can not happen? He can not change his opinion?
Btw, which distro shipped ext4 before it was included (splitted) into
mainline?

Just say no to double standards!

P.S. Added Linus to copy list, hope it will be interesting...

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux