On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:32:31 +0400 Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi. > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 02:11:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton (akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > A new filesystem such as the one he's working on would, one hopes, be used > > by an increasing number of people. Whereas I expect that the already-tiny > > number of people who use OMFS will *fall* over time. > > It is not about pohmelfs, but any other. When did you look at fs/kconfig > last time? There are lots of filesystems which were obsoleted way before > I first time started using computer. Hope you saw with pdp-11 in action > (I only on pictures), since sysv filesystem is very unlikely to get new > users today. Or befs - beos is very widely distributed os. Others? This has already been addressed. > > Guys, a few years ago Linus's rule of thumb for merging an FS was, > > approximately, "it is already being shipped by distros". The bar is _much_ > > lower than that now. Largely because I personally think that it should be. > > And Linus was wrong. This can not happen? He can not change his opinion? > Btw, which distro shipped ext4 before it was included (splitted) into > mainline? > > Just say no to double standards! I've already told you that we no longer apply such a strict test. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
