Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > > Yes, that's quite annoying as FUSE doesn't work with my architecture, > > > > so I can't use the only good NTFS driver.... grr! :-) > > > > > > I'm not quite getting this joke :) > > > > It's not really a joke. It really is a problem: I'm supposed to > > provide NTFS support for a project, but the kernel I'm using doesn't > > work with FUSE (too old for the FUSE version needed by ntfs-3g), > > How old? The out of tree fuse module (hoping to get rid of it soon) > works down to 2.6.9. Beyond that it does probably require a fair > amount of porting work. I imagine that backporting FUSE to 2.4 no-mmu will be more work than backporting a filesystem, but I could be mistaken. Moving my project to a 2.6 kernel (*any* 2.6 kernel) would be much more work than either. All other filesystems I care about are in-kernel - NTFS is quite exceptional in needing FUSE just to get ordinary, stable file access. (The in-kernel NTFS is regarded as unstable and missing essential basic features.) None of this should be taken as any kind of criticism. I love what you guys have done. -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
